Be wary of billionaire heirs
I
have a great reverence for sport movies that focus away from their
sport. Of course, Foxcatcher has wrestling in it, but it isn't
defined by it. Instead, erupting from the core and spreading to the
peripherals, themes of greed verses resentment and power grappling
with vulnerability showcase the darkness of this picture.
Predominantly, these thematic roots grow on Foxcatcher Farm, and it
is this setting, reminiscent of the Bates Motel from Psycho, where
the bulk of underlying madness unfurls and exhibits itself. The story follows two Olympic wrestlers and winners of gold meddles, Mark and David Schultz, who become beneficiaries of billionaire heir, John Du Pont, where he allows them to use his farm to train for the next Olympics, and to house a state-of-the-art gym, in return for Du Pont to act as the Head Coach of the USA wrestling team. Things are not all as they seem though, as the character of John, a socially awkward ermine like creature, becomes enveloped my an insane power that inflicts tragedy upon the Schultz brothers and their family. Everything
about Foxcatcher is bleakly captivating, from purposefully awkward
dialogue to cold, trenchant direction from Bennett Miller who has
just been nominated for the Academy Award for Best Director. One of
his prior films, Capote contained an intrinsic theme of isolation in
oneself, which is prevalent to Foxcatcher, and is handled as
gracefully as it is bluntly by the helmer. The source of this film's
power though exists within the acting. Steve Carell, ripping off his
habitual comedy label, performs a chillingly authentic portrayal as John Du Pont, where slowness and restraint are key to exemplify insanity. He is up
for Best Actor at the Oscars. Mark Ruffalo is terrific and sincere as
David Schultz. He is up for Best Supporting Actor at the Oscars. And then
there is Channing Tatum, as David's younger brother Mark Schultz. He is not up for an Oscar, yet for me, this
is his film. He is brutally honest and dives into deep
cavities of emotions whilst being, for the most part, reticent in
allowing them to boil over. The Academy's choosing of backing Carell
and Ruffalo is just, as they are both brilliant, though Tatum should
be celebrating with them. It is comparable with The Fighter three
years ago when Mark Wahlberg was snubbed and Christian Bale and
Melissa Leo won the plaudits. No matter. It is right that people
remember performances, not awards, and that is why Tatum's show as
Mark Schultz here won't be forgotten. People will be exhilerated by
Foxcatcher; a stark, dark tapestry of tragedy that demands your
attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment